Once it seemed there was never anything good on TV. Streaming has only solved part of the problem.
Viewers certainly are awash in content: According to Reelgood, which aggregates data from streaming platforms, subscribers can currently choose from a total of 36,674 TV shows and movies among the nine largest subscription-based streaming services, at any time day or night. But quantity doesn’t mean quality; only 46% of those shows and movies are considered quality or high-quality offerings based on their IMDb viewer scores, according to Reelgood’s data.
This creates a bit of a conundrum for the operators of streaming platforms. Compelling new content is vital to keeping subscribers—and landing new ones—in a market where viewers can now sign up and cancel services with a mouse click.
But many of those same operators are under pressure from Wall Street to stanch the losses and cash burn from their streaming platforms. And even the profitable ones, such as market leader
no longer have a blank check from investors to splash out on content spending in pursuit of more subscribers. Netflix has told its investors that it plans to keep its content spending relatively flat this year compared with last year even as its free cash flow nearly doubles to at least $3 billion.
Rivals are sounding similar notes. At a
conference last month,
Chief Executive Officer
Robert Iger
spoke of the need to “better rationalize our costs” for the streaming business.
CEO
David Zaslav
told analysts during the company’s last earnings call in February that 60% of the content on the company’s HBO Max service was hardly being viewed, adding that “we need to monetize that in order to drive shareholder value.”
Streaming subscribers should thus prepare for a new reality—one in which new content isn’t simply fire-hosed onto platforms for artificially low prices. Movies in particular will see a big shift as established media players push more releases into a recovering theatrical industry while some have also…
Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at WSJ.com: World News…