A former U.S. attorney has warned that President Donald Trump‘s attempt to freeze certain federal funds could incite a “constitutional confrontation,” given the potential overriding of Congress‘ fiscal powers.
“Can a president unilaterally substitute their own funding decisions for those of Congress?” Joyce Vance said Thursday. “The answer is, they can’t.”
Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment.
Why It Matters
Legal and constitutional objections could prevent Trump’s plans from being carried out. These have been at the forefront of the mounting list of lawsuits against the White House since the announcement was made on Monday evening.
Economic objections have also been raised. Dr. Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute previously told Newsweek that “the long-term consequences would be catastrophic” and “guaranteed to cause a steep recession” as federal grant funding is pulled out of the economy.
What To Know
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announced the pause on federal grants and loans via a memo sent to the heads of all executive departments and agencies on Monday.
Acting Director Matthew J. Vaeth said that the freeze was required as the agency conducted a review to ensure that federal dollars were not being used to promote “Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies.”
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
After concerns were raised that this could impact specific programs on which many Americans rely, the OMB released a follow-up memo. This clarified that “in addition to Social Security and Medicare…mandatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP will continue without pause.”
According to Vance, however, the president does not necessarily have the authority to override Congress’ constitutional power of the purse, which would be defined as an example of “impoundment” and proscribed by the 1974 Impoundment Control Act.
She wrote on her Substack blog that this act “effectively ended a president’s power to impound funds,” a ruling reaffirmed by the Supreme Court‘s 1975 decision in Train v. City of New York.
“The only way Trump can proceed with impoundment is if the [Impoundment Control Act] is unconstitutional and Train is reversed,” Vance added.
What People Are Saying
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law,…
Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at Newsweek…